In today’s urban landscape, dog walkers have become invaluable assets to pet owners striving to balance busy schedules with their pets’ exercise needs. More than just a casual stroll through the neighbourhood, professional dog walking demands a keen understanding of canine behaviour, health, and safety. These dedicated individuals ensure that our four-legged friends receive the physical activity, mental stimulation, and outdoor time essential for their well-being, providing peace of mind to pet owners while they’re away.
Today, we explore the tale of a dog owner who faced disappointment after trusting the task of walking his dog to a family member. OP mentioned that her unemployed brother was seeking a source of income. As a solution, OP proposed a deal: pay the brother to walk Bella in the mornings and evenings. For the first few weeks, everything seemed fine. OP provided the brother with Bella’s pe* pad and bags for cleanup during the walks. However, after some time, OP realized Bella wasn’t using her pe* pad. When questioned, the brother admitted that Bella wasn’t p**ping during their walks. Concerned, OP consulted a vet, leading to multiple visits and tests with no clear reason for Bella’s behaviour. The truth emerged when the brother confessed that he hadn’t been cleaning up after Bella, leaving the pe* pad unused. Frustrated and angry, OP immediately terminated the brother’s walking duties.
Continue scrolling down to delve into the full story.
Source: Reddit
1. Is OP wrong for letting go of his brother as the dog walker due to costly vet bills resulting from his deception?
2. OP (27m) hired his unemployed brother (24m) to walk his dog, Bella, in the mornings and evenings to help him out financially and to ease his work schedule.
3. A few weeks into his brother walking Bella, OP noticed she hadn’t used her pee pad for #2. When asked, the brother revealed Bella wasn’t going during their walks.
4. He repeatedly confirmed Bella wasn’t p**ping during walks, which concerned OP. After a vet visit, including a physical and blood work, no health issues were found with Bella.
5. The vet recommended an abdominal ultrasound for Bella, which was costly. While awaiting results, the brother visited and inquired about OP’s behaviour, noticing something was amiss.
6. OP confronted his brother about Bella’s condition, and the brother admitted to lying, revealing he didn’t want to clean up Bella’s waste and let her go in neighbours’ yards instead.
7. The OP became furious, yelling at his brother for causing unnecessary worry and expenses. Despite his brother’s plea for another chance, OP decided to fire him from the dog-walking job.
8. He repeatedly texted apologies, emphasizing his need for the job, which has garnered support from their parents. OP is torn, questioning if he’s overly emotional or justified in his decision to not rehire his brother.
Now that you have read the story, it’s time for you to see what Redditors had to say about this. Read till the end to see what are other people’s opinions on this.
9. OP’s brother should reimburse him for the expenses.
10. Offer him a second chance: after covering the vet bill through unpaid walks, he can resume getting paid. He might not agree given the amount of “unpaid” work involved.
11. NTA. If the parents support his negligence, they should cover the vet bills.
12. The Redditor believes the money originally intended for the brother to walk the dog was spent at the vet due to his lies.
13. You were essentially helping him out with extra cash, but his negligence led to costly vet bills.
14. You aren’t obligated to give him a job or income!!
15. Explain you can’t afford to pay him after the vet expenses.
16. ESH. Using a pe* pad inside isn’t ideal. You shouldn’t have trusted your brother’s word without confirming.
17. Stand firm; your parents shouldn’t fault your justified reaction. He lied and caused unnecessary expenses and worry about Bella.
18. If OP’s brother valued the job, he would’ve done it honestly and properly. The brother should clean up the mess he left around the block.
19. Open communication could have resolved this earlier. Alerting him about the potential vet expenses might have prompted him to confess sooner.
20. It’s surprising how often parents side with the one at fault. Family or not, some responsibility should be taken.
The Reddit community overwhelmingly supports OP, asserting that re-hiring his brother isn’t advisable due to the breach of trust. Some critics, however, feel OP should have verified his brother’s claim before incurring vet expenses. Fortunately, Bella is fine, but the financial loss seems irretrievable. Do share your thoughts in the comments section below.
Stay tuned for more such stories!